Click here to download our brochure in PDF format.
Click here to download our brochure in PDF format.
| Pregnant? Need help? | |
| Click here for Resources |
![]() |
| Georgia bans most late-term abortions, assisted suicide |
By David Beasley
ATLANTA | Wed May 2, 2012 2:16pm EDT ATLANTA (Reuters) - Georgia Governor Nathan Deal signed into law two pieces of legislation on Tuesday to restrict late-term abortions and outlaw assisted suicide in the state. The first law banned most abortions after 20 weeks' pregnancy, making Georgia the eighth U.S. state to outlaw most late-term abortions based on controversial research that a fetus can feel pain by that stage of development. Georgia already prohibits most abortions starting in the third trimester. |
| The Bishops' War on Women, Nuns, and...Paul Ryan? |
|
Tue Apr. 24, 2012 12:21 PM PDT
When the US Conference of Catholic Bishops declared war on the Obama administration on religious freedom grounds, the GOP was right there with them. Republicans cited the bishops' complaints as they blasted the administration's contraception mandate in health care reform, and gave the bishops a prominent platform on the Hill to air their grievances. When the Obama administration declined to award a new contract to the USCCB to serve clients of human trafficking, as it had been for the past five years, GOP members of Congress came out swinging.
|
| Separation Anxiety: Abortion Funding & the Affordable Care Act |
|
On March 12, as required by the Affordable Care Act, the federal government released regulations that will determine how state health-insurance exchanges will work. Within days, the law’s opponents charged once again that “tens of millions of Americans will be getting federal subsidies to pay for abortions.” What’s more, according to the critics, the new regulations will end up tricking prolife Americans into inadvertently signing up for insurance plans that cover abortions. |
Only registered users can leave comments. If you are a registered user, please click here to log in. If not, click here to sign up.
The bishop's position on this floors me. During the past years, the actions--and inaction--of the hierarchy has left me filled with a sense of bitterness and loss. And then, God be praised, I had a revelation while I was praying the morning Office. Going back, say, to 1300, you can see that the hieararchy--especially the popes--has played what might be a divinely ordered dual role. On the one hand, they have been an anchor in a stormy world.
Take, for instance, the popes' resistance to efforts by kings to control the Church. But on the other hand, they have created problems so breathtaking today's problems seem small. For instance, the decision to stay in Avignon and alienate all of Europe by their system of taxation. This was followed, of course, by the great schism, with three men claiming to be pope, and then by the rationalist, corrupt popes whose excesses triggered the Reformation.
And so I prayerfully concluded that it would have been much worse to be a faithful Catholic in those days in comparison to today. Well, there was the small matter of the sex abuse scandal. But that makes my point. If my faith really depends on a faithful papacy, I am in trouble. I have to live my faith where it is really lived: In the simple parish.
Yep. It may happen often enough to fairly be considered consistent. The grand words and phrases are aimed in that very direction. It is confusing in as much as the distance between the orator and their aim is so great.